Categories: Channel NewsIT Trends

Microsoft’s Surface poses tricky questions for Intel

The most telling comment in the speculation-fest over Microsoft’s upcoming Surface tablets is a single line at the end of the BBC’s story: “Intel was not available for comment”.

For once, this cannot be put down to the execrable standard of journalism at the BBC; or to inefficiency on the part of Intel’s PR department. Intel always has a comment, even if it’s just an anodyne ‘Intel does not speculate on future products’, or my personal favourite, ‘Intel does not comment on imitator’s products.’

Intel’s silence can be explained by its sole purpose in life – to sell more chips. Were it to appear to wholeheartedly support Microsoft’s foray into box shifting, it would risk alienating every other manufacturer planning on bolting together a Windows 8 tablet, so it has to avoid being seen as favouring the folks from Redmond over everyone else.

On the other hand, the company cannot maintain too low a profile as the entry-level Surface uses – speak it soft – an ARM processor.

But Intel’s unavailability for comment isn’t simply down to it being unsure of what to say in order to avoid upsetting its customers – Microsoft on one hand and world+dog on the other. It’s even more interesting.

Right now, Intel suits are sitting in meeting rooms talking about the unthinkable – Intel itself going into the box-shifting game – something it has studiously avoided since the dawn of time.

The argument goes like this: If we upset all our customers except Microsoft, maybe we should start banging out our own tablets under the Intel brand. What do we have to lose?

This, of course, might result in Microsoft becoming upset with Intel too and pulling the plug on X86 Surfaces. This in turn could mean that in 12 months’ time, the tablet market will be split in two, with Microsoft making entry-level, consumer ARM machines and Intel handling the higher end, business market.

That would mean Apple having to reconsider its stance in this sector. While the World’s Richest Company TM can shrug off the threat posed by iPad-alikes from the usual suspects, were both Intel and Microsoft to enter the market, it would give Apple considerable food for thought.

Perhaps even to the point where Cupertino would have to consider licensing its own mobile OS technology to third party tablet makers to avoid being caught in a deadly pincer movement from Seattle and Santa Clara.

Steve Jobs might be preparing to spin in his grave…

Tamlin Magee

Recent Posts

Flashpoint enters new chapter with global partner programme

Security vendor Flashpoint debuts partner programme following $28m funding

7 years ago

Channel partner “disconnect” hindering growth

Complex buying journeys and sprawling partner networks hampering customer experience, says Accenture

7 years ago

Cyxtera launches global channel partner programme

Datacentre provider Cyxtera says launch is “milestone in our go-to-market strategy”

7 years ago

US IT provider brings mainframe services to UK

Ensono highlights importance of mainframes still to major industries

7 years ago

VASCO and Nuvias expand distribution across EMEA

Security vendor VASCO looks to replicate UK and German set up across EMEA

7 years ago

Splunk says channel investments driving growth

Splunk details investment in Partner+ programme at .conf2017

7 years ago